Subject	That white paper didn't explain much, btw.
Posted by	Marshall on January 10, 2003 at 4:44 PM
	This message has been viewed 17 times.
In Reply To	Don't believe it? Read the white paper. posted by Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) on January 10, 2003 at 04:31 PM
Message	I just read it, and it doesn't explain the demographics of the people it surveyed. That's a pretty important piece of information missing. It only says: 2,000 participants comprising a representative Internet sample responded in this survey. What is "representative"? They could have explained it a little better if they're trying to prove the legitimacy of the study. But anyway, I don't really care. I personally like flash.
Follow Ups	SZR: Tear me a New One TT.net!!! - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 12:57:09 01/10/03 function over form (n/m) - Halo Z 13:13:47 01/10/03 Could you elaborate? (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 13:20:03 01/10/03 it's... - niXit 13:36:57 01/10/03 What resolution are you on? Thanks for comments =). (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 15:59:30 01/10/03 from what i could see it looked clean. but - Halo Z 13:49:29 01/10/03 I agree. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 15:59:50 01/10/03 But that's...aaahh nevermind. (n/m) - JRH(KY) 13:29:49 01/10/03 hmmm....let me see...you need... - Datzun 13:27:21 01/10/03 Personally I don't like opening graphics...usually a waste - hoss 13:31:53 01/10/03 imgaine, your 189 hits on tt.net with opening graphics?? - six3077 13:35:27 01/10/03 umm...bad spelling, grammar, etc (n/m) - Furious(Houston) 13:34:07 01/10/03 I copied and pasted text. I'll proof-read and edit. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:00:36 01/10/03 everythings too small. pictures of tires, etc. - niXit 13:40:35 01/10/03 it's impossible to even read the about us page. - niXit 13:47:05 01/10/03 "about us" works fine for me on 800x600.... - Furious(Houston) 13:55:05 01/10/03 for me, its a very tiny grey blur box (scrollable!). (n/m) - niXit 13:56:02 01/10/03 hahaha - check it>>>. - Furious(Houston) 13:57:26 01/10/03 I'll work on the text size. Thanks. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:02:02 01/10/03 Re: Nice, but I would ad a little more graphics to it. >> - nemesiZ(Dallas) 13:57:52 01/10/03 yea, I'd rather download 3 megs of graphics then get data :\ (n/m) - niXit 14:03:33 01/10/03 Re: yea, I'd rather download 3 megs of graphics then get data :\ - nemesiZ(Dallas) 14:07:14 01/10/03 weak dude....so, so, weak...man.... (n/m) - Furious(Houston) 14:12:15 01/10/03 It will have sizes, prices, and application guide. Not done. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:03:24 01/10/03 It will have prices when finished. Not complete. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:02:42 01/10/03 FAQ needs a serious proofreading. (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 14:17:23 01/10/03 try avoiding scroll bars - Playboy 14:53:43 01/10/03 Should be dialup friendly... any dialup comments? (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:04:41 01/10/03 "don't use flash". that'll make it very dialup friendly. (n/m) - niXit 16:08:56 01/10/03 Compare the file sizes: - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:15:42 01/10/03 No response? (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 17:53:33 01/10/03 Yah, that's big for dialup - NATAZ 18:53:42 01/10/03 I like it >> - DanZMan 14:55:24 01/10/03 Penetration level, lol - Marshall 16:26:13 01/10/03 Don't believe it? Read the white paper. - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:31:12 01/10/03 I didn't say that - Marshall 16:33:47 01/10/03 Conflict of interest... I know ;). (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:47:24 01/10/03 yeah, exactly. (n/m) - Marshall 17:00:27 01/10/03 That white paper didn't explain much, btw. - Marshall 16:44:04 01/10/03 Site looks fine, loads quick so far, not sure about the name - kandy2dr 18:20:36 01/10/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.